Categoriearchief: Aanbevolen

Trio-dag Zeemanshuis

Op zondag 5 juni 2016 vindt er een Piano Trio dag plaats in het Zeemanshuis te Amsterdam waarbij allemaal ‘Piano Trios for Young Players’ van mijn hand gespeeld gaan worden door diverse violisten, cellisten, pianisten en fluitisten. Er worden in totaal 10 trio’s uitgevoerd door allemaal ‘Young Players’. Er doen ± 30 kinderen aan mee, en diverse docenten. De dag wordt georganiseerd door violiste/viooldocente Monique Dowgwillo. Voor deze dag zijn een aantal nieuwe trio’s geschreven speciaal voor fluit, viool en piano en voor fluit, cello en piano. Deze zullen uitgegeven worden in de Alfred (UK) serie waarvan binnenkort de eerste twee delen uitkomen.

Cover nieuwe trio's
Cover nieuwe trio’s

Dit is de samenstelling van de groepen (de namen tussen haakjes zijn de docenten):

Cats (fluit, viool, piano) door; Sam (12. Gerda) + Rouven (12, Monique) + Ilja (12, Brook)

Horse Ride (fluit, cello, piano) door; Stanne (9, Gerda) + Vincent (9, Heleen) + Rozemarijn (9, Brendan)

Hurdy-Gurdy (fluit, viool, piano) door; Fenna (10, Gerda) + Roemer (11, Coutier) + David (10, Heleen)

Windmill (fluit, viool, piano) door; Sophie (10, Gerda) + Luit (10, Coutier) + Ruben (10, Jana)

Japanese Fireflies (fluit, viool, piano) door; Caitlyn (8, Gerda) + Wolfje (9, Monique) + Annelinde (10, Jana)

Jumping Rabbits (nr. 4 viool, cello, piano) door; Eliot (7, Brendan) + Betty (7, Monique) + Tess (8, Brook)

Memories (nr. 6, viool, cello, piano) door; Daantje (12, Brendan) + Simone (12, Coutier) + Jane (11, Brook)

Chinese Dragon (nr. 10, viool, cello, piano) door; Maxwell (8, Brendan) + Julia (8, Monique) + Alyssa (Heleen)

Wheeping Whale (nr. 3, viool, cello, piano) door; Ties (11, Janece) + Nyske (13, Monique) + Stella (11, Brendan)

At the Farm (nr. 2, viool, cello, piano) door; Noah (8, Brendan) + Marthe (8, Monique) + Pomme (8, Jana)

Suzuki parents at the piano lesson

This article I copied from elissamilne.wordpress.com (Elissa Milne)
It clearly deals with the role of the parent during the Suzuki lessons.
It seems very strict but I think she’s right.. although I’m not so firm myself, sometimes..

Schermafbeelding 2016-04-06 om 09.04.12

Parents who sit in on piano lessons

Parents of piano students: you immediately subdivide into Those Who Send Their Children In, and Those Who Sit In On The Lesson.

Just quietly, piano teachers probably also have you classified on quite different grounds as Those Who Think Practicing Is Optional, and Those Who Take This Seriously.

But for now we are talking specifically about what’s in it for you, for your child, and for the teacher when you choose to sit in on a lesson. And what you simply must never ever do.

I would guess that a significant majority of piano teachers who give one-on-one piano lessons would much prefer it if the parent(s) stayed out of the room while the lesson was in progress. In practice most teachers will insist that parents not sit in on lessons. And for some good reasons: students change when their parents are present! Almost without exception they become more withdrawn, less confident when trying something new, and less willing to share their opinions. Teachers are very reluctant to risk admitting these kinds of behavioural adjustments to their lesson when so much about playing the piano (or mastering any performance skill) requires openness and confidence.

There are other reasons teachers keep the lessons genuinely one-on-one: as a generalisation, parents generally end up ‘coaching’ their child through a lesson, offering the answers a student is too slow to speak, assuring the teacher the child sounded much better at home, and explaining the life events that prevent their child from being quite as good as they would otherwise have been that particular week. This all takes up a lot of time in the lesson, and contributes nothing useful to the teacher’s task of making a material difference to the child’s pianistic and/or musical skill set within 30 minutes.

And sometimes (not always) teachers can be a little shy themselves, and the presence of a parent can hamper the teacher’s sense of ease and flow.

All of which may have parents thinking (having read my frank descriptions) that there can be nothing at all to be gained from sitting in on a lesson.

But, when managed correctly, this is quite far from the case.

A parent sitting in on a piano lesson will be much more aware of the teacher’s concerns and instructions than the parent who never puts their face inside the studio. And a parent who observes the piano lesson will know what is required of the child throughout the next week, possibly even with a very clear idea as to how to assist the child with the more challenging aspects of their work.

I particularly welcome parents sitting in on their child’s lesson when the parent has a somewhat restricted/non-existent musical knowledge from which to draw when helping their child at home. It is extraordinary how much a parent will pick up from observing even a single lesson – things that are fundamental to good performance, but which the parent had no awareness of before.

Here are the ground-rules I use in my lessons to ensure maximum benefit to both student and parent:

Parents are seated out of the sight-line of both student and teacher, keeping the conversation in the lesson between the student and teacher, and minimising the opportunities for parent and child to begin a debate, for the parent to randomly interject, and for the child to turn to the parent for approval.

Parents must not answer for their children or play the piano in place of them. Parents must not say anything to disparage the child. Parents must not make excuses for the child. This is all pretty challenging to many parents, especially those in the habit of doing their children’s homework!

And probably most important of all, parents must not use the lesson to praise their children! Many a time I’ve heard a student give a barely competent (let alone polished) performance only to have the parent chime in at the end “Isn’t he sounding brilliant this week?” or some such similar irrelevant and ill-informed judgement. This creates a diversion from the task of improving the performance (or some related learning activity) while the teacher assesses the cost-benefit of explaining to the parent why, and in which ways, the performance was entirely unworthy of praise.

Does it go without saying that it’s just plain embarrassing all round when parents put forward incorrect answers or explanations during the lesson?!

Finally, parents should not sit in on the lesson if they plan to be actively disinterested in proceedings. If you are sitting in the lesson but preoccupied with reading a magazine or reading reports from work, this sends a clear message to the child – it might look like I’m interested, but as you can clearly see, I’m not.

If parents do wish to sit in on lessons, it’s well worthwhile for teachers to take a minute at the end of the lesson to debrief (or, more properly, rebrief) the parent as to what is required at home, the salient points to be mastered, and a quick summary of what their child did right that day. There will be another student waiting for their lesson to begin, so parents need to curtail their conversations to the proportions of the lesson time.

Finally, no matter if you choose to sit in on a lesson or send your child in to enjoy some completely individual attention from the piano teacher, do work with the teacher, and not at cross-purposes! If the teacher has asked your child to practice slowly, don’t encourage your child to play fast. If the teacher has asked your child to practice for three hours in the week, don’t tell your child that two and a half hours will do.

Your role in the ongoing progress of your child-pianist is vital, so no matter what arrangement you come to regarding your attendance at the piano lesson, do take yourself seriously as a music-educator. Because that, irrespective of your levels of experience and expertise, is exactly what you are!

Olifanten hebben gevoel voor muziek

Dat olifanten dieren zijn met een hoog bewustzijn, dat wisten we al.
Maar deze twee films op Youtube (alweer van een tijdje geleden, maar daarom niet minder opmerkelijk) zijn echt ongelooflijk.

Op de eerste staan twee olifanten, Kelly en Viola, prachtig te dansen op het Concerto voor twee violen van J.S.Bach:

Olifanten dansen op Bach

Bach Concerto
Bach Concerto

op de tweede wordt er zelfs meegespeeld en geswingd:

Olifant Peter speelt piano (Thailand)

Meeswingen bij de blues!
Meeswingen bij de blues!

Wat mij betreft meesterlijk!

Wat we mijns inziens hieruit kunnen concluderen is:
– olifanten zijn zeer intelligente en gevoelige dieren
– muziek is universeel

Bruidsmars door Aimeline

Aimeline met moeder Janine tijdens de les
Aimeline met moeder Janine tijdens de les

Aimeline en haar moeder Janine hebben samen op 16 maart 2016 de bruidsmars van Wagner gespeeld tijdens de bruiloft van de oma van Aimeline.

Hier kun je het horen tijdens de repetitie.

Filmpje Youtube: Bruidsmars repetitie

.. en hier is het bruidsmeisje tijdens de bruiloft

Aimeline tijdens de plechtigheid: de stoel is wat aan de lage kant, maar ze houdt haar polsen evenwel prachtig omhoog! ;-)
Aimeline tijdens de plechtigheid.. de stoel is wat aan de lage kant, maar ze houdt haar polsen evenwel prachtig omhoog! 😉

Suzuki lessons: when progress seems too slow..

This article was placed by a violin colleague, Brecklyn (www.pluckyviolinteacher.com). I think this issue is important to read, as well for teachers as for parents. So I copied it and put it on my website. Not to forget! The image I found on internet, it was not included in this article.

Heleen

Schermafbeelding 2016-02-21 om 13.34.04


HELP! MY SUZUKI TEACHER WON’T LET US GO TO THE NEXT PIECE!

February 17, 2016 by Brecklyn

WHEN YOU FEEL YOUR PROGRESS IS TOO SLOW…

How many times have you heard first variation of twinkle this week? I know. For some of you with beginning students, you’ve probably heard your child or the recording of “variation A” hundreds if not thousands of times. It’s enough to make you lose your mind.

t’s not just that though. It can be so frustrating when we see other students moving to new pieces while we are still playing the same piece for months. Your child may be getting bored. You may be getting bored.

You might feel like your Suzuki teacher is going too slow. Being too picky. I understand this feeling, and felt it many times when I was a student myself, but it is important to understand why your teacher is moving your child slowly through the repertoire.

There are a few possible reasons your teacher is moving slowly. Let’s assume that your child is playing the correct notes, rhythms, and bowings with decent intonation. (If this isn’t happening, then that’s probably why you’re not moving more quickly.)

Your teacher wants to prepare your child for the difficulties coming in the next pieces.

There is a big jump in complexity between some pieces, and almost no jump between others. For example, is Andantino harder than Allegretto? Not really. But Gossec Gavotte is 100 times harder than Happy Farmer. In my opinion, La Folia is basically a kick in the face after Bach Double. Your teacher may be waiting to start the next piece because the next piece has unique difficulties that they want to prepare you for.

Your teacher wants to focus on some technical issues.

Playing the violin, or any instrument, is a pretty complicated activity. The movements aren’t always natural and it requires a great deal of focus and attention. Tension can creep in and lead to very uncoordinated and awkward movements, which become deeply ingrained habits. It is important to address these technical issues quickly and thoroughly as they can inhibit future progress and even cause injury. Moving your child to more difficult repertoire without addressing serious tension issues can actually cause overuse injuries. Not good.

Your teacher wants your child to polish and perfect their pieces.

Playing music is more than just playing the right notes and rhythms (with the right bowings, of course.) What about dynamics and phrasing? Learning to play dynamics and phrasing is the beginning of developing your child’s unique musical expression. Teaching children to express themselves and communicate through music is one of the many lessons we want our children to learn in music lessons. They can only do this when they aren’t totally focused on playing the “right” notes, so those have to be learned first. Some of the polishing and perfecting happens when the piece is in “review” but you need to know how should be played before it can be relegated to the review portion of your practice.

Of course, these are just my thoughts on the subject. There may be other reasons to move slowly through the repertoire.

Believe me, your Suzuki teacher wants your child to progress and improve. We get sick of Martini Gavotte too! If you are concerned about a lack of forward movement, please, discuss it with your child’s teacher. They may have insight that you don’t. And, if you or your child are frustrated, we want (and need) to know! Maybe your teacher can provide a supplemental piece to keep things interesting while you polish the piece you’re stuck on. If you don’t communicate these issues, we may never know that there’s a problem.

Above all, be patient and don’t compare. Your child didn’t learn to speak in a week, or even in a matter of months. It took him years to learn all of his vocabulary, the rules of grammar, and he’s still perfecting them now. Try to adopt an attitude of excitement for every small step in this journey and show your child that it’s not just new songs that mark improvement. Better intonation, straighter bow, bigger tone, increased focus..treat all of these things as milestones on the way.

Of course, the main requirements for quick progress are pretty obvious. Take an inventory to make sure that you’re not missing one of these vital components.

Are you listening to the current (and coming) pieces a LOT? I’m talking every day for at least an hour.
Are you practicing consistently? Dr. Suzuki suggested practicing every day that you eat.
Are you practicing carefully? Haphazard practicing leads to messy playing, and little to no improvement.
Have you ever felt like your teacher was going too slow? If you are a teacher, when you put on the brakes what are your reasons?

Best way to learn new skills

This interesting article was pubished by the Washinton Post. I should like to share it with you.

Foto: Heleen Verleur
Photo: Heleen Verleur

If you’re trying to improve your golf swing or master that tricky guitar chord progression, here’s some good news from researchers at Johns Hopkins University: You may be able to double how quickly you learn skills like these by introducing subtle variations into your practice routine.

The received wisdom on learning motor skills goes something like this: You need to build up “muscle memory” in order to perform mechanical tasks, like playing musical instruments or sports, quickly and efficiently. And the way you do that is via rote repetition — return hundreds of tennis serves, play that F major scale over and over until your fingers bleed, etc.

The wisdom on this isn’t necessarily wrong, but the Hopkins research suggests it’s incomplete. Rather than doing the same thing over and over, you might be able to learn things even faster — like, twice as fast — if you change up your routine. Practicing your baseball swing? Change the size and weight of your bat. Trying to nail a 12-bar blues in A major on the guitar? Spend 20 minutes playing the blues in E major, too. Practice your backhand using tennis rackets of varying size and weight.

“What we found is if you practice a slightly modified version of a task you want to master, you actually learn more and faster than if you just keep practicing the exact same thing multiple times in a row,” said Pablo Celnik, an author on the study, in a statement.

Here’s how they arrived at that conclusion. The researchers recruited 86 healthy volunteers and asked them to learn how to perform an abstract motor task that involved moving a cursor across a screen by squeezing an object connected to the computer. “The screen test featured five windows and a ‘home space,’ ” according to a release describing the study. “Participants were asked to move the cursor from home to the various windows in a set pattern as quickly and accurately as possible.”

Essentially, the recruits had to learn how to use a mouse that operated via squeezing, rather than sliding around.

The subjects were separated into three groups. All three groups participated in an initial testing session. Then, two of the groups did a follow-up exercise six hours later. The first group performed the exact same test as before. The second group did a six-hour follow-up too, but their test was different. The rules were similar — move a cursor around by squeezing something — but the researchers subtly altered the test by changing the amount of force required to use the cursor.

A third group, serving as a control, didn’t perform any six-hour followup.

Finally, all three groups performed the initial test again, 24 hours after it was first taken. The question: Which group would perform best, showing the greatest increase in ability to move the cursor?

The control group — the ones who didn’t do a six-hour follow-up session — performed the worst. The group that repeated the exact same test six hours later did considerably better.

But the folks who did the variation of the test at six hours performed best of all — 24 hours after the initial session they scored nearly twice as high on the task as the group that did the same test at six hours.

“For skills to improve, we must update an existing memory with new information,” the researchers conclude. If you practice the exact same thing the exact same way every time, you’re not layering much new knowledge over what you already know.

But, the theory goes, subtly changing things up and adding tension between what your body already knows and what it doesn’t can help you learn skills faster.

The researchers caution that it’s important not to change things up too much. If you’re trying to improve your golf swing and spend 20 minutes a day shooting hoops, you’re probably not doing yourself any favors. “If you make the altered task too different, people do not get the gain we observed,” Celnik said. “The modification between sessions needs to be subtle.”

Source: Christopher Ingraham from The Washington Post